By BEN NWABUEZE
Elder statesman, Professor Ben Nwabueze(SAN) has called on Nigerians living in the South to be wary of the fact that their entire security apparatus rests in the hands of Northerners in what he believes coheres to President Muhammad Buhari’snorthernisation agenda.
In a statement entitled Whether The Eradication Of Corruption Is The Motivating Object Of The On-Going War Against It, the elder statesman who is also Chairman of The Patriots, a think tank of Nigeria’s elder statesmen, Said: “Northerners are occupying the offices of the Chief of Army Staff (COAS), Director- Generals of DSS, NIA,
Inspector General of Police, Chief of Staff to the President, Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), Controller-General of Customs and Immigration, Minister of Internal Affairs, National Security Adviser, Minister of Petroleum, 15 out of the 22 Assistant Inspectors General of Police among other sensitive positions.”
Noting that the “15 appointments listed above are strategic appointments as they relate to the prosecution of the war against corruption,” Nwabueze, the first academic to be conferred with Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), further explained:
1. Ibrahim Idris, IGP, appointed over the heads of some southern officers senior to him:
“The IGP is heading a Police Force, the Nigeria Police Force (NPF), in which 15 out of the 22 Assistant Inspectors-General of Police (AIG), who exercise much of the function of the operational control of the Force, are northerners, while three are from the South-West and two from the South-East.
“These blatantly lopsided appointments, all of which were made since the inception of the Buhari Administration, portray the NPF as an army of occupation deliberately designed to carry out President Buhari’sNorthernisation Agenda in furtherance of the dream of the Sardauna to reduce the South to a conquered territory and thereby prevented from having control over its future.
“The President’s implacable opposition to re-structuring which envisages the establishment of State Police should not, therefore, surprise us. He wants to be able to continue to exercise control over the internal security of the Southern States and to continue to hold them hostage. It caricatures true federalism that a constituent state in a Federation should be under the control and yoke of the Federal Government in the matter of its internal security.
2. Daura, Director-General, Department of State Services, DSS, replacing ItaEkpenyong
“Apart from the DG, the directors are mostly northerners. The control of the NPF and DSS by northerners must be taken together with the fact that the Minister of Interior and the Permanent Secretary of the ministry are northerners; that the Army and Air Force are headed by northerners and, above all, that President MuhammaduBuhari, a northerner, is the Commander-in-Chief of the Nigerian Armed Forces, and has the power under the Constitution to direct the operational use of the NPF for the maintenance and securing of public safety and public order; his power to direct the operational use of the DSS is even more plenary.
“The implication of the control of security by northerners is that the security of Nigeria and Nigerians is an exclusively northern affair, thereby putting the rest of us at their mercy.
3. AbubakarMalami, SAN, Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice (AGF):
“(He is) a young SAN, who was raised to the rank in 2008, i.e. seven years before his appointment as AGF.
4. Lt-Gen AbdulrahmanDanbazau (Rtd), Minister of Interior.
5. MagajiAbubakar, Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Interior
“He has publicly admitted to have wrongfully sidetracked the Head of Service (HoS), Mrs. Winifred Ekanem Oyo-Ita, a southerner, in the reinstatement of AbdulrasheedMaina, and has apologized to her accordingly: see the Vanguard of December 1, 2017.
6. Ibrahim Magu, Acting Chairman, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC:
“Still kept in office in an acting capacity since 9 November, 2015 because of repeated refusal by the Senate to confirm his appointment.”
7. Hamed Ibrahim Ali, Controller-General, Nigerian Customs Services:
“Customs is the underbelly of corruption in Nigeria.”
8. Mohammad Babandede, Controller-General Nigerian Immigration Services:
“Immigration stands implicated in Maina’s escape out of Nigeria after his sack from the civil service and his subsequent re-entry into it.”
9. Amb. MuhammedDauda, Acting Director-General National Intelligence Agency (NIA):
“(He) replaced Ayo Oke, a southerner, after he was sacked, following the discovery in the NIA offices in the Osborne Towers, Ikoyi, of the sum of $43 million, £27,800 and N23 million.
10. AlhajiAmedIdris, Accountant-General of the Federation, replacing Jonah OgunniyiOtunla, a southerner.
11. MaitantiBaru, Group Managing Director, Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC):
“(He) replacedIbeKachikwu, a southerner, who, as Minister of State for Petroleum and Chairman, NNPC Board, was sidelined by Baru in the process for the award of some NNPC contracts; earlier he had been downgraded from Minister of Petroleum to Minister of State for Petroleum, with the President taking over as his own Petroleum Minister.
12. AbdulrasheedMaina, Chairman, Presidential Task Force on Pension Reform:
“Although his initial appointment took place before the Buhari Administration, his reinstatement after he was sacked occurred during that Administration, with the President’s approval as the evidence shows…
“There are of course other lopsided strategic appointments, such as the appointment of Professor MahmoodYakubu as Chairman, Independent Electoral Commission (INEC), and HadizaBala-Usman as Head of the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA). The listed appointments raise critical issues as to the intention or design behind them.
“They look like a swoop on the South, a jihad designed to foist Northern domination, or even subjugation, on the South in pursuance of the Sarduana’s agenda, announced as far back as 1960, to subjugate the South and reduce it to a conquered territory, with the object of preventing it from having control over its future,” an agenda which President Buhari, in a speech in May 2015 as President-elect, re-echoed and vowed to carry to a finish.
“What other reason could there be for concentrating in the North the appointments to all the positions vital to the effective prosecution of the war against corruption? We need to be told. One hopes that the order for the purchase of warplanes from the U.S., ostensibly to fight Boko Haram terrorism, is not connected with the hidden agenda for a jihad.
“The 15 appointments stand uncontroverted. And yet in a futile attempt to controvert the incontrovertible, the President, responding to a newspaper report that 81 of 100 appointments made by him were from the North, published a list of 159 appointments made by him, 85 of which were from the South and 74 from the North: see the Vanguard November 6, 2017.
“We are being treated again to another irrelevancy designed to befog a critical issue and to hoodwink the Nigerian people. The President is simply preying on the gullibility of the public in anything that comes from him.
“What all this means is that corruption is being fought, not by an all-inclusive team of officials, but by officials drawn from one section of the country, the North, separated in interests, outlook and attitude from the South, which makes the war look like an exclusively Northern affair, hence the increase in public cynicism about the President’s sincerity as leader.
“The cynicism seems to have reached its peak in the Maina case, tagged by the media as the Maina saga or Mainagate, involving several billions of naira allegedly stolen from the Pension Fund Scheme superintended by the Presidential Task Force Reform Team of which AbdulrasheedMaina was Chairman.
“The aspect of the Maina case that aroused great public interest and heightened public cynicism about the sincerity of the President as leader of a crusade was the threat by the Chief of Staff to the President, Alhaji Abba Kyari, a northerner, to “query” the Head of Service of the Federation (HoS), Mrs. Winifred Ekanem Oyo-Ita, a southerner, for saying that she informed the President of Maina’s reinstatement which was effected against her opposition.
“The threat was made in the view of people, including the Vice-President, arriving at the Council Chambers for the weekly meeting of the Federal Executive Council. The threat and the HoS instant but angry response triggered public reaction. Is the HoS under the authority of the Chief of Staff as to make her amenable to a query by him?
“Why should he publicly utter such a threat, except perhaps as an over-zealous show of solidarity for a master from the same section of the country, the North? Was the motive a concern to shield a fellow northerner? The public was not told anything more about this scandalous exhibition of sectionalism other than that the controversy had been settled by the President meeting privately with the two quarrelling officials.
“But, the public cynicism remains. Was something being concealed from the public about the whole Maina saga? Was the President, in fact, privy to Maina’s return to the country and his reinstatement into the civil service, and did he authorise it? Maina’s testimony came on 29 November, 2017, as reported in the Vanguard of that day.
He said: “When this government came in, the President gave his note that go and sit down with Maina. I have given you the approval. They sat down with me… The process of my reinstatement started after the Attorney-General, MrMalami, visited me. As soon as the present government decided to sit with me, and after sitting with me, I told them I will not leave you to go back to Nigeria without something in your pocket. I’m going to give you something in your pocket, and the Minister laughed.
“Maina’s testimony has not been countered by government. The eradication of corruption requires the concerted efforts of all Nigerians fighting together as one people under an all-inclusive government, not a government perceived to be one for one section of the country only, the North, and from which the other section feels alienated.”