UK pays £1.7bn import fraud charges to EU

Great Britain ruled by King Charles III has agreed to pay the European Union princely £1.7 billion in reparation for stolen customs duties on imported goods, concluding payment of the £2.4 billion slammed on the Nigeria’s colonial master for fraudulent dealings.

The United Kingdom had earlier paid the EU some £583 million during the period Queen Elizabeth reigned, bequeathing the remaining to be paid under King Charles.

The Oracle Today reports however that the administration of the UK’s parliament controlled government is run by the Prime Minister who reports the monarchy.

The UK government announced yesterday that it would pay the European Commission a further £1.7 billion or €1.9 billion to settle the long-running dispute with the EU over import fraud, the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) reported.

In 2018, the commission sued the UK for €2.7bn, on the grounds the UK had failed to pass on the correct amount of tax for imports between 2011 and 2017.

In March 2022, EU judges largely ruled against the UK in the case.

The UK Treasury acknowledged the money was a “substantial sum” but argued it would “draw a line” under the case.

In a written statement to Parliament minister John Glen also said the government wanted to avoid building up a larger bill through “further protracted legal proceedings”.

The £1.7 billion figure comes on top of around £600 million the UK paid the commission in June 2022 to settle the amount it considered was due at the time.

The UK officially exited the EU’s legal system in January 2021; however, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) retains the power to make rulings in cases relating to how the UK applied EU law before Brexit.

In 2018, the UK was accused of taking inadequate steps to prevent fraud after it was warned about the problem by the EU’s watchdog, Olaf, in 2017.

An investigation by Olaf found that the UK was a “significant hub” for fraud, whereby organised crime groups used fake invoices to undervalue goods like textiles and footwear being imported from China – many of which were destined for the black market in other parts of the EU.

In its judgement, the ECJ found the UK had done too little to prevent fraud on imports, and had not given enough information to the commission.

It ruled that the undervaluation of imports meant the UK had not passed on the correct share of import taxes or VAT payments.

As an EU member at the time, the UK was obliged to make the payments to the Brussels-based body as part of its contribution to the EU budget.

The UK disputed the amount owed, arguing that the method used by Olaf to calculate the underpayments was not appropriate.

The EU judges upheld the commission’s claim in March 2022, although it rejected how it calculated the final figure.

Mr Glen said: “Whilst the UK has now left the European Union and this is a legacy matter from before our departure, the government is keen to resolve this long-running case once and for all.”