Kaduna Governor, el-Rufai wins suit against newspaper firm over alleged defamation
Kaduna State Governor, Mallam Nari el-Rufai has won his N10 million defamation suit filed against a media firm, Today Publishing Company Limited, publishers of the Union Newspaper.
A Federal High Court sitting in Kaduna awarded the sum of N10 million as damages the media company for defamation.
It would be recalled that Governor el-Rufai had approached the court in 2015 after the newspaper, on its July 2, 2015 publication had reported that the governor had declared assets worth N90 billion along with 40 housing properties.
El-Rufai, in a suit numbered KAD/KDH/285/15, subsequently sued the newspaper company for damages.
Delivering judgement, Monday, the presiding judge, Justice M.L. Muhammed, ordered the defendants to pay El-Rufai the sum of N10 million as general damages and tender an apology that must be published in two national dailies.
The court held that the plaintiff had clinically demonstrated through his pleadings and evidence led in support that he never declared assets worth N90 billion and 40 mansions.
The court reiterated that the plaintiff had “proven the ingredients of defamation to wit: publication of the offending words; that the words refer to the plaintiff; that the words are defamatory of the plaintiff; that the words were published to third parties; that the words are false; and that there are no justifiable legal grounds for the said publication.”
It held that “by Exhibits 1 and 2 (the print and electronic versions of the said publication), the plaintiff had shown that indeed the offending material was published by the defendants to third parties.”
The court also held that by Exhibit 11 (the plaintiff’s assets’ declaration form submitted to the CCB), the plaintiff had satisfactorily shown that he did not declare assets worth N90bn and 40 mansions, the implication of which is that the words were false and defamatory of the plaintiff.
Similarly, the court noted that the first defence witness concluded his testimony by admitting that there was no basis for the said publication.
It further referred to the testimony of the first defence witness, which was replete with admissions and held that the defendants had failed to prove justification, air comment and qualified privilege.
The court perpetually restrained the defendants from further defaming Governor El-Rufai.
El-Rufai’s lawyer, Abdulhakeem Mustapha (SAN), described the ruling “as a well-considered judgment which was replete with industry and erudition”.
